Electoral College in India

Go Back

This document simulates the US’ Electoral College, the system used to elect the President, in India and how it would pan out. The data used is of the 2019 General Election which elected Narendra Modi to power. With the Electoral College, Modi would be re-elected with a large margin.

Process

The Electoral College is a system used in various countries to choose a President. This document focuses on the US implementation, which is the most widely-known. In this system, each state has a set number of votes, and all these votes go to the party which gets most votes. The disadvantage of this is explained in detail in the “Results” section. There is also another process to find out how many votes each state gets, that’s given below.

  • The Electoral College allots votes to each state somewhat proportional to their population
  • Each State gets a number of votes according to their population
  • They also get an additional 2 votes, which comes from their representatives in the Senate
  • In each state, the party with most votes gets all representatives in the College, regardless of their winning margin
Votes for a State = Proportional Votes + 2 Senate Votes

Note: Because all federal divisions in the US are states and have the same rights, they all have 2 seats in the Senate. In India, there are 8 UTs which need separate rules to reflect their lower authority. Even if the US Senate was used, they would not have any Senators and thus would have only their Proportional Votes. This document adjusts for that by removing the two Senate votes.

Allotment

The seats allotted to each state and Union Territory (as of 2019, 36 total divisions) is as follows:

State Population Number
Uttar Pradesh 237882725 297
Bihar 124799926 157
Maharashtra 123144223 155
West Bengal 99609303 126
Madhya Pradesh 85358965 108
Rajasthan 81032689 103
Tamil Nadu 77841267 99
Karnataka 67562686 86
Gujarat 63872399 82
Andhra Pradesh 53903393 69
Odisha 46356334 60
Telangana 39362732 51
Jharkhand 38593948 50
Kerala 35699443 47
Assam 35607039 47
Punjab 30141373 40
Chhattisgarh 29436231 39
Haryana 28204692 37
NCT OF Delhi 18710922 26
Jammu & Kashmir 13895343 20
Uttarakhand 11250858 16
Himachal Pradesh 7451955 12
Tripura 4169794 8
Meghalaya 3366710 7
Manipur 3091545 6
Nagaland 2249695 5
Goa 1586250 4
Arunachal Pradesh 1570458 4
Puducherry 1413542 2
Mizoram 1239244 4
Chandigarh 1158473 2
Sikkim 690251 3
Daman & Diu 242911 1
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 372813 1
Andaman & Nicobar Islands 417036 1
Lakshadweep 73183 1

In the US, each vote ranges from representing almost 700,000 people in California to about 200,000 people in Wyoming.

Population per electoral vote in each state in the US

Uttar PradeshBiharMaharashtraWest BengalMadhya PradeshRajasthanTamil NaduKarnatakaAndhra PradeshGujaratOdishaJharkhandTelanganaHaryanaKeralaAssamChhattisgarhPunjabNCT OF DelhiPuducherryUttarakhandJammu & KashmirHimachal PradeshChandigarhTripuraManipurMeghalayaNagalandAndaman & Nicobar IslandsGoaArunachal PradeshDadra & Nagar HaveliMizoramDaman & DiuSikkimLakshadweep0200000400000600000800000
StatePeople per Vote

In India, a vote in the Electoral College would go from representing 800,000 people in UP to 230,000 in Sikkim, which is almost the exact same range as in the US. This is important since it determines how much relative power a citizen in, for example, Sikkim has compared to a voter in Bihar. The Sikkim voter has a higher influence over the result of the election.

This is intentional and done to give more power to smaller states and ensure that large states are atleast somewhat limited over their influence over the elections.

The outlier is Lakshadweep, which has just 73,183 people for its vote. This is due to its population being much, much smaller than any other division in the country.

Results

Before viewing results, it must be noted that the Electoral College is not a pure reflection of popular opinion. The College makes it much harder for parties to win votes without coalitions, and benefits regional parties. Regional disparities within states are all but ignored. In the Westminster system, for example, Nagpur (MH) can vote INC and Mumbai (also MH) BJP and both would be represented by their chosen party. However, with the Electoral College, BJP would win all of Maharashtra’s votes since Mumbai has a much larger population, and INC voters in Nagpur would not count towards Maharashtra’s votes for PM.

Note: In the US, Maine and Nebraska proportionally distribute their votes, but all other states use the same winner-takes-all system. This has led to much criticism for the system within the country, especially from people who don’t vote the same way as their state does, since their vote doesn’t count nearly as much as it might.

Party Votes Percent
NDA 1225 69.0
Other 307 17.3
UPA 244 13.7

The results of the Electoral College if it were used in the 2019 General Elections are very clear. It awards the NDA Alliance with 1225 of 1776 votes. The UPA would secure 244 votes, and other parties including TRS (Telangana), AITC (Bengal) and more would hold 307 seats. Detailed results for each state are also given below.

State Party Votes
Andaman & Nicobar Islands UPA 95308
Andhra Pradesh Other 30739524
Arunachal Pradesh NDA 379679
Assam UPA 7786757
Bihar NDA 21793708
Chandigarh NDA 231188
Chhattisgarh NDA 6953196
Dadra & Nagar Haveli Other 104007
Daman & Diu NDA 37597
Goa NDA 438413
Gujarat NDA 18091275
Haryana NDA 7364108
Himachal Pradesh NDA 2661281
Jammu & Kashmir NDA 1652721
Jharkhand NDA 8272264
Karnataka NDA 18067804
Kerala UPA 9709289
Lakshadweep UPA 44879
Madhya Pradesh NDA 21423131
Maharashtra NDA 27501203
Manipur NDA 919891
Meghalaya UPA 660114
Mizoram NDA 252993
Nagaland NDA 500510
NCT OF Delhi NDA 4908541
Odisha Other 10972815
Puducherry UPA 444981
Punjab UPA 5532221
Rajasthan NDA 19645004
Sikkim NDA 350416
Tamil Nadu UPA 20253838
Telangana Other 8798384
Tripura NDA 1055658
Uttar Pradesh NDA 42896642
Uttarakhand NDA 2954833
West Bengal Other 26650275

States of India with winning party and number of votes

Notes

  • Alliance information from various Wikipedia pages. Some minor parties may not be accounted for properly, resulting in discrepancies from ECI figures. Unfortunately, I could not find any authoritative source of information about this, and thus, some parties may not be included in the figures.

    However, the outcomes for all states except Sikkim will not change; only the number of votes may change.

    In the state of Sikkim, the SKM party has been considered part of the NDA despite not having an official alliance. This is because they were close to forming an alliance, and after the general election, formed a coalition with the BJP and have since been part of the NDA. I’ve presumed that they would, if given the chance, vote for a BJP executive.

  • Election data is from ECI.gov. Link

  • States and their population figures obtained from StatisticsTimes. Link

  • Graph and site generated with R and RMarkdown.

  • US figures from Wikipedia and various other sources